WASHINGTON (Army News Service, Oct. 16, 2009) -- Testing anomalies cited in an Oct. 16 Government Accountability Office report on body armor do not mean the plates are unsafe, said Brig. Gen. Peter Fuller, program executive officer for the organization that fields new equipment to Soldiers.
During a media conference Oct. 16, at the Pentagon, just hours after
release of the GAO report, Fuller said that the 85,000 "X Small Arms
Protective Inserts" of interest in the report have not been fielded to
Soldiers and are in storage, and that the plates now in Soldiers' use
are safe.
"We have the best body armor by far," said Fuller of PEO Soldier, "And
we appreciate the oversight we get from organizations such as GAO,
because what they do is ensure we provide the very best to our Solders."
Fuller said the Army has worked closely with GAO and other
organizations to improve testing and evaluation in the acquisition
process, and that the Army has in fact made improvements. The GAO
report, he said, points out pains the Army has had with improvements in
its evaluation and testing processes.
"The challenge we are having with this GAO audit report is they are
challenging our processes, and I think what we are really identifying
is we have had an evolution of processes and we need to better
articulate what we are doing there," he said.
The 85,000 XSAPI inserts are ceramic plates that fit into tactical
vests for wear by Soldiers to provide protection against projectiles
and fragmentation. The GAO report questions adherence of the Army to
some testing protocols when evaluating the plates.
"Overall reliability and repeatability of the test results are uncertain," the report said.
Fuller said the Army is conducting additional testing on the plates to
document their safety in compliance with standards. Phase II testing,
he said, has already been conducted, and Phase III testing will start
in November.
"We told GAO ... we told the Hill yesterday, we are interested in
taking all this data, the Phase II testing, Phase III testing, the
additional surveillance testing -- wrap it all up in one report and
provide it back to the Hill," Fuller said.
Fuller said he hopes to articulate to both GAO and Capitol Hill that
there have been challenges with Army testing protocols, but that the
armor is in fact safe.
Fuller said that Phase II testing on both plate designs in question have shown a "very high statistical confidence interval."
"They are fantastic plates," Fuller said.
Source and credits : http://www.army.mil/-news/2009/10/16/28935-army-says-body-armor-safe-despite-gao-report/?ref=news-science-title2
|
